quote:
Originally posted by NJPornstar
www.seabreeze.com.au/gallery/gallery.asp?imageid=6271
Cool pic.
Nice perspective.
Actually, it's also an interesting example of kite-marketing design.
You know when I view the shot......
I'm thinking there's something missing on the kite ?
Like maybe a logo ?
There's a lot of value to be had in displaying a clever logo.
Instant identification of a brand name without actually spelling out the brand name.
A word-picture...
no, a picture-word,
an icon,
whatever.
Of course, the NEW brand name is right there,
printed on the kite canopy in bold capital letters.
Twice in fact.
However,
the top NEW looks like NEW written in Russian......
and the bottom NEW looks like NEW written in Greek.
The English version is from the opposite point-of-view.
the NEW word is not 'right-reading',
cause it's printed on the outside and it's being read from the inside in this pic.
Fair enough.
But do you get my drift ??
Now,
if you had a kite brand name like say... 'OXO'
it wouldn't matter, hey ?
Right-reading or wrong-reading.....same, same.
But the logo ideally needs to be symmetrical about its centre...or close to it.
Otherwise you get the same problem.
For instance,
take that Flying Objects logo that's on the back of the harness in the same pic.
Simple, smart, sym-abt-its-centre.
Of course, its roots are of the Pole,
so when its on the clear monofilm poley sail it reads right, both ways.
It works, it reads right and the little birdy-wings kind of tell the story.
But back to the kite...
(Nice kite by the way)
Pornstar, do you have a NEW logo ?
I mean, do you have a logo...new or old ?
Cause I have a suggestion if you are interested.
I'm always here to help.
Hey, maybe this could swing into yet another kite competition ?
I just love kite competitions.
Anyway, this is my suggestion:
The logo could be of a large 'sparkle'.
You know, the sparkle icon graphic thing that you see reflecting from
the surface of a 'new', shiny, glossy, smick kite.
A giant gleam,
a big bling,
the super sparkle.
What do you reckon, dude ?
Too bathroom-cleanserish maybe ?
Too cheesey ?