world peoples movement

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
ockanui
ockanui
VIC
1321 posts
VIC, 1321 posts
16 Oct 2011 2:14pm
Interesting to see footage of the start of a new people's movement that transcends political leanings against the greed of "Wall St Bankers". The system as we know it, doesn't seem to be working anymore, the evolving debt crisis creating social upheaval, marginalizing the masses and creating deep divisions in the layers of Society.
Mountains of people worldwide with lost opportunity and disaffected by the mismanagement of the financial system, one that seemingly rewards those within it, whilst the majority are left to ponder.
Maybe we are witnessing the birth of change as required as the world moves to the precipice, hopefully a change to a more optimistic, holistic approach, people power can bring about change, voice your opinion
kyteryder
kyteryder
NSW
692 posts
NSW, 692 posts
16 Oct 2011 2:41pm
Is that "The peoples front of judiah"
Or
"The Judiah's People front"
SandS
SandS
VIC
5904 posts
VIC, 5904 posts
16 Oct 2011 3:08pm
Mmmmmm, I did see some news on the rally / sit in / festival at wall st .

People with the time to rally on a permanent basis , says to me that they have too much leisure time on their hands, no requirement to work, scavenge , beg ,steal, garden, hunt, in order to feed themselves and their family.

I agree that this world is not sustainable as is .

But what is the answer ?

I don't think wall st is the main problem.

I think we all want too many " things" to much unnecessary stuff produced and purchased .

Maybe we all need to be contented with a more simple existence ?

We could start buy burning every jet ski in existence !!!
Simondo
Simondo
VIC
8025 posts
VIC, 8025 posts
16 Oct 2011 3:21pm
It's very interesting actually. I haven't thought too much about it, but in a strange way, the people hold the balance of power....

Kind of like a massive World Wide Strike in the future....
kiteboy dave
kiteboy dave
QLD
6525 posts
QLD, 6525 posts
16 Oct 2011 3:41pm
**** aussies can be such sheep. Oh the Seppos are having a rally so we better copy them. Never mind the fact that things are very very different over there. They actually have real problems to complain about like:

Widespread Unemployment
Poverty
Cities like Detroit in chaos and ruin
Terrible welfare system
Horrendous "health care" system
Gun Crime
Religious right nutjobs taking over politics

We have none of those problems. So what the ****ety **** are people out there in our cities whinging about???
samoht
samoht
QLD
111 posts
QLD, 111 posts
16 Oct 2011 4:02pm
kiteboy dave said...



We have none of those problems. So what the ****ety **** are people out there in our cities whinging about???


Maybe they are demonstrating their support so the same problem does not happen down here.

Also my retirement savings have taken a dive because those greedy people are manipulating the unregulated share markets.
So it does have some effect on us in this "GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT"
American Financial Institutions cough, we all get the flu....
kiteboy dave
kiteboy dave
QLD
6525 posts
QLD, 6525 posts
16 Oct 2011 5:00pm
samoht said...
Maybe they are demonstrating their support so the same problem does not happen down here.


I fail to see how a raggedy protest that can't even decide what it's protesting about will make any difference to the state of our lives in 10 years from now..


samoht said...
Also my retirement savings have taken a dive because those greedy people are manipulating the unregulated share markets.
So it does have some effect on us in this "GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT"
American Financial Institutions cough, we all get the flu....


It sucks that this happened. Really anyone old enough to have super has taken some hit. The biggest pain is obviously those closest to retirement, particularly the ones who were decent earners and had chosen aggressive/risky strategies. My old boss used to call me in to his office and gloat... "wow my super has gone up 70 grand in the last 3 months". He took a huge hit but if you take away the growth in the 2 years before that (call it a correction) then it wasn't such a bad drop.

However... if you want to talk global environment then you have to look at Oz in a global environment. I have been very very poor at quite a few points in my life. I have been comparatively wealthy at other points. I have lived in quite a few countries and stayed 3 months + in a lot of other countries. I have been working for nearly 25 years, sometimes 2 jobs at once.

Australia is one of the few countries where if you try hard you can find a job and if you work hard in that job you can be financially comfortable.

That's what it boils down to.

There's a lot of places in the world where you can work 12hr days and struggle to afford a 1 room shack and some rice & vegetables for your family.

Here if you work 12hr days you can pay off a beautiful house (compared to most of the world) on it's own block of land in a decent area, drive a reasonable car, sit on a new couch to watch your 50" tv at night. The government provides working healthcare and school systems so your partner can work as well and your kids are healthy, occupied and getting set for their futures. You feel safe walking around your neighborhood. What more could you really ask for?









ockanui
ockanui
VIC
1321 posts
VIC, 1321 posts
16 Oct 2011 6:46pm
We are exceptionally lucky to live in Australia, lucky to be able to enjoy the fruits of our labour [so to speak] and to be afforded free speech, but from a simple man's perspective we are connected to the global environment and just recently our economy was stimulated by an input of billions of dollars [ merits of which is another discussion] caused by a near/ potential collapse of a financial system the ramifications are still to be felt ie Europe' defaulting countries. its all entwined, as for the protest I agree is seems haphazard in its approach, but in historical terms when a mass of people have consensus of opinions things can change ie Australian's involvement in the Vietnam War [ not diminishing the high regard I have for the diggers]
I think its about the corporate responsibility, integrity and regulation of the Industry in question.

I know, tell me I'm dream'n
BulldogPup
BulldogPup
6657 posts
6657 posts
16 Oct 2011 5:51pm
ok - you're dreamin'
Agent000
Agent000
161 posts
161 posts
16 Oct 2011 10:33pm
hey kiteboy, should we wait till we don't have all this before we say something is rotten with the plan? is there a plan? honest question
sure times are good now but I'm not sure any steps are being made to make it a better place for our kids (anyway I've got to get back to doing nothing about it )
pierrec45
pierrec45
NSW
2005 posts
NSW, 2005 posts
17 Oct 2011 2:03am
I thought I was watching the news, but I musta missed something somewhere...

Someone enlighten me please.
What is their plan again? What are the precise, unified objectives?

Just protesting is not an action plan, it is merely a particular action.
I too think corps and banks are greedy, but they work mostly within the guidelines and rules granted by (and sometimes for the benefits of) the governments we merrily elected.

How many people working 9-5 left their job to go sit around all day?

PS: whilst we're at it, I'd like to protest about the lack of wind lately...
evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
17 Oct 2011 12:54pm
kiteboy dave said...
Here if you work 12hr days you can pay off a beautiful house (compared to most of the world) on it's own block of land in a decent area, drive a reasonable car, sit on a new couch to watch your 50" tv at night. The government provides working healthcare and school systems so your partner can work as well and your kids are healthy, occupied and getting set for their futures. You feel safe walking around your neighborhood. What more could you really ask for?


Totally agree, but it is changing. I think the current Qantas debacle illustrates it nicely. CEO cuts 1,000 jobs, moves work offshore, gets 70% pay rise. And the stock price fell. That pay rise could probably have supported about 100 people's jobs. Social morals have become an issue.

There is a breaking point for any society when wealth disparity becomes too great.

However, yeah, We aren't even close in Australia.
FlySurfer
FlySurfer
NSW
4460 posts
NSW, 4460 posts
17 Oct 2011 1:17pm
The focus of the protest is about the normal Joe having to bail out the FAT cat.
Or the normal Joe paying more tax than the FAT cat.

This is how it works all over the world, and in Australia.

All the profits are privatised, and when ever there's trouble the trouble gets socialised.

Eg: Privatise the profits, socialise the loses.

Australia has enormous natural resources and a small population, and this contributes to our standard of living which is among the best in the world.

If the government bails out any bank, remember that's your money, and the bank is going to use it to pay the 6 figure salaries of it's executives... like Ralph Norris: $3,500,000 base.

Don't forget banks make money by lending, the more YOU borrow the more THEY make. So when the government boosts large scale purchases "First Home Buyer boost"... it creates MASSIVE demand for debt which is what the banks sell.

Right now things are good in Australia except the cost of living (www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/rankings_by_country.jsp), among the highest in the world, but that doesn't mean they can't be even better.

Like I've said before, complacency is the atrophy of progress.

A progressive thinker once said: We shall have no better conditions in the future if we are satisfied with all those which we have at present.
felixdcat
felixdcat
WA
3519 posts
WA, 3519 posts
17 Oct 2011 10:18am
pierrec45 said...

I thought I was watching the news, but I musta missed something somewhere...

Someone enlighten me please.
What is their plan again? What are the precise, unified objectives?

Just protesting is not an action plan, it is merely a particular action.
I too think corps and banks are greedy, but they work mostly within the guidelines and rules granted by (and sometimes for the benefits of) the governments we merrily elected.

How many people working 9-5 left their job to go sit around all day?

PS: whilst we're at it, I'd like to protest about the lack of wind lately...


Are you talking about Tony and the Libs?????

Mobydisc
Mobydisc
NSW
9029 posts
NSW, 9029 posts
17 Oct 2011 2:14pm
Very few people would be grievenced by entrepreneurs who create wealth for themselves and for their workers through their own creativity, hard work and risk. What more people are becoming annoyed about are the corpratists who do not create wealth but redistribute wealth to themselves and their class, usually through massive salaries, share bonuses and incredible fringe benefits. Then when things go a bit bad the government comes in to help out. Meanwhile they sack ordinary workers who were on ordinary incomes. The governments and regulations protect these corpratists against competition and the threat of failure.

To say this is not an issue in Australia is not true. In 2008 the federal government promised to guarantee all deposits held with banks up to a million dollars or something like that. So in other words the government backs up some of the biggest and most profitable companies in Australia. The issue with that is how many other companies get that sort of guarantee? Not that many. I don't think any company should be guaranteed by the government. If a top bank fails then there are plenty of other businesses out there who would be happy to take up the gap in the market.

When we get into the idea that a company is too big to fail then action needs to take place. Either break up the company so its not too big if it fails or get rid of the idea in the first place.

Recent reforms of Australian public company executive pay are a step in the right direction. If 25% of shareholders reject an executive pay deal for two years in a row, the company board will be removed. Why should executives receive annual salaries the average worker won't get in a life time if the company is poorly run with shareholders losing money?


K Dog
K Dog
VIC
1847 posts
VIC, 1847 posts
17 Oct 2011 2:17pm
FlySurfer said...

The focus of the protest is about the normal Joe having to bail out the FAT cat.
Or the normal Joe paying more tax than the FAT cat.

This is how it works all over the world, and in Australia.

All the profits are privatised, and when ever there's trouble the trouble gets socialised.

Eg: Privatise the profits, socialise the loses.

Australia has enormous natural resources and a small population, and this contributes to our standard of living which is among the best in the world.

If the government bails out any bank, remember that's your money, and the bank is going to use it to pay the 6 figure salaries of it's executives... like Ralph Norris: $3,500,000 base.

Don't forget banks make money by lending, the more YOU borrow the more THEY make. So when the government boosts large scale purchases "First Home Buyer boost"... it creates MASSIVE demand for debt which is what the banks sell.

Right now things are good in Australia except the cost of living (www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/rankings_by_country.jsp), among the highest in the world, but that doesn't mean they can't be even better.

Like I've said before, complacency is the atrophy of progress.

A progressive thinker once said: We shall have no better conditions in the future if we are satisfied with all those which we have at present.


Flysurfer is right.... Australia is a smacky addict and doesn't know it has a drug problem....

Australia is a country of oligopolies.....(forgive my spelling)... we have four main banks that pretend to be competitive.... and self regulated... RBA rates don't change a thing... Massive gouging on the working mans income in one of the most over taxed countries with a tax system that pours money into middle class welfare and provides tax cheats for well structured tax affairs.... a neg gearing poisen where basic necessity of a home has been turned into a trading commodity.... which increases home prices much to the jubilation of investors and some home owners who don't realize that if they only have one house and sell it for 750k the next one is equally inflated... the banks love it because they have MASSIVE loans = massive profits, state govs loves it because of MASSIVE stamp duty income (which they were supposed to abolish btw with the GST comming in), you then have a choice of Woolworths or Coles for shopping.... then you have music and videos being 50-100% more here than OS when the dollar is on par.... retailers having to recently face the music with ludercrus (spelling again) mark-ups....

I get my glasses for 1/3 of what retail sell them.... as Australia has parallel importing by only two major optical companies..... the guy I get em off buys direct from OS... but due to supplier pressure, he can't get one brand as they have a supply agreement with the two major companies and they won't sell outside of that.... fair competition... FORGET ABOUT IT!

I feel sorry for the poor youth of today considering buying a house.... to think back in the 60 - 70's you could actually own your house in ten years... it cost only 2 to 3 times your annual income and your wife could stay at home and spend valuable time with your kids.... forget about it.... we've progressed Now all they have to look forward to is a mortgage for life.... the prospect of a land tax on the family home... and being squeezed out by cashed up OS investors......

Then we have huge foriegn investment in our agricultural industry.... buying up the food basket.... our utilities.... mining... for the profits and control to go overseas....
As long as the cash lines our pockets, the greed continues and people are happy to sell the farm.....

Australia is happy to be ripped off as long as they get the crack hit (middle class welfare)....

/end-rant



DEBT OWNS YOU.
log man
log man
VIC
8289 posts
VIC, 8289 posts
17 Oct 2011 3:17pm
FlySurfer said...

The focus of the protest is about the normal Joe having to bail out the FAT cat.
Or the normal Joe paying more tax than the FAT cat.

This is how it works all over the world, and in Australia.

All the profits are privatised, and when ever there's trouble the trouble gets socialised.

Eg: Privatise the profits, socialise the loses.

Australia has enormous natural resources and a small population, and this contributes to our standard of living which is among the best in the world.

If the government bails out any bank, remember that's your money, and the bank is going to use it to pay the 6 figure salaries of it's executives... like Ralph Norris: $3,500,000 base.

Don't forget banks make money by lending, the more YOU borrow the more THEY make. So when the government boosts large scale purchases "First Home Buyer boost"... it creates MASSIVE demand for debt which is what the banks sell.

Right now things are good in Australia except the cost of living (www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/rankings_by_country.jsp), among the highest in the world, but that doesn't mean they can't be even better.

Like I've said before, complacency is the atrophy of progress.

A progressive thinker once said: We shall have no better conditions in the future if we are satisfied with all those which we have at present.

So, now FL are you going to join the socialist worker party?????? sounds like you've discovered left politics to me ...... well great, now can you support the mining tax, same sex marriage, carbon tax(yeah I know), on shore "processing", NBN etc
evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
17 Oct 2011 4:03pm
Mobydisc said...
To say this is not an issue in Australia is not true. In 2008 the federal government promised to guarantee all deposits held with banks up to a million dollars or something like that. So in other words the government backs up some of the biggest and most profitable companies in Australia.


What? That sounds much more like the government backing individual's ...individuals' (...where does the apostrophe go there?) money.

japie
japie
NSW
7146 posts
NSW, 7146 posts
17 Oct 2011 5:28pm
evlPanda said...

Mobydisc said...
To say this is not an issue in Australia is not true. In 2008 the federal government promised to guarantee all deposits held with banks up to a million dollars or something like that. So in other words the government backs up some of the biggest and most profitable companies in Australia.


What? That sounds much more like the government backing individual's ...individuals' (...where does the apostrophe go there?) money.




Way I read it is they are backing the bank. Sure it looks as though they are protecting individual's loot, but who gains?
K Dog
K Dog
VIC
1847 posts
VIC, 1847 posts
17 Oct 2011 5:39pm
japie said...

evlPanda said...

Mobydisc said...
To say this is not an issue in Australia is not true. In 2008 the federal government promised to guarantee all deposits held with banks up to a million dollars or something like that. So in other words the government backs up some of the biggest and most profitable companies in Australia.


What? That sounds much more like the government backing individual's ...individuals' (...where does the apostrophe go there?) money.




Way I read it is they are backing the bank. Sure it looks as though they are protecting individual's loot, but who gains?


And off the guarantee they ran out and sought further OS funds based on their risk profile... so levered of the gov guarantee....... profit before people... always...
FlySurfer
FlySurfer
NSW
4460 posts
NSW, 4460 posts
17 Oct 2011 5:45pm
evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
17 Oct 2011 5:54pm
K Dog said...

japie said...

evlPanda said...

Mobydisc said...
To say this is not an issue in Australia is not true. In 2008 the federal government promised to guarantee all deposits held with banks up to a million dollars or something like that. So in other words the government backs up some of the biggest and most profitable companies in Australia.


What? That sounds much more like the government backing individual's ...individuals' (...where does the apostrophe go there?) money.




Way I read it is they are backing the bank. Sure it looks as though they are protecting individual's loot, but who gains?


And off the guarantee they ran out and sought further OS funds based on their risk profile... so levered of the gov guarantee....... profit before people... always...


Imagine a company out to make a profit. Just imagine.

By the way: Hand up those that have experienced a run on a bank, that has your money in it.
japie
japie
NSW
7146 posts
NSW, 7146 posts
17 Oct 2011 5:57pm
I think that what people are protesting about is the system, ie the financial system. However there appears to be a good deal of confusion as to what exactly is going on. It has come to light in New York that a mob of Serbian professional protesters have been organising the protesteriat and that this may have been financed by the democrats as an opportunity to usurp the protests and turn it into a re-elect Obam campain.

Who knows.

What is certain is that the days when cowries might buy you a wife are long gone. The original concept of using money as a medium for exchange has developed into hydra that is throttling the globe.

If we were able to step back to a time, say 1500 years ago, and we had a word with a merchant, and told him that in the future he would keep his profits safe in a bank, and that that bank would then be able to breed money for the bank from his deposit, I think he would look very grave and tell you that he was glad that he was living now and not in the future.

The current system is a giant ponzi scheme that has to be changed, not only for the good of humanity but also for the well being of the planet.
log man
log man
VIC
8289 posts
VIC, 8289 posts
17 Oct 2011 5:57pm
I believe in ending all poverty and eradicating all known diseases. My hobbies are horse riding and meeting people. In the future I believe we will all travel in underwater jet cars.
FlySurfer
FlySurfer
NSW
4460 posts
NSW, 4460 posts
17 Oct 2011 5:58pm
Banks have to pay for the guarantee, the rate depends on their credit rating.

SomeOtherGuy
SomeOtherGuy
NSW
807 posts
NSW, 807 posts
17 Oct 2011 5:59pm
japie said...

evlPanda said...

Mobydisc said...
To say this is not an issue in Australia is not true. In 2008 the federal government promised to guarantee all deposits held with banks up to a million dollars or something like that. So in other words the government backs up some of the biggest and most profitable companies in Australia.


What? That sounds much more like the government backing individual's ...individuals' (...where does the apostrophe go there?) money.




Way I read it is they are backing the bank. Sure it looks as though they are protecting individual's loot, but who gains?


I do. Or at least, if I go to the bank to collect my pay and the bank can't give it to me then I definitely LOSE. Backing individual's funds was to save the bacon of the small guy.
SomeOtherGuy
SomeOtherGuy
NSW
807 posts
NSW, 807 posts
17 Oct 2011 6:05pm
evlPanda said...

By the way: Hand up those that have experienced a run on a bank, that has your money in it.


Nearly.

Many years ago, some idiot on radio (John Laws??) made some incredibly stupid comments on air about St George Building Society (before it became a bank) not being able to pay customers. Within a couple of hours some branches had queues out the door of people wanting to withdraw money. My brother rang me at work to tell me he was on his way to take out whatever he had in there.

I still remember the Premier of the day (Neville Wran) on the news - he'd gone out to the branch in the city and was telling everyone very loudly that it was a load of bunk and that the Society was solid.
K Dog
K Dog
VIC
1847 posts
VIC, 1847 posts
17 Oct 2011 6:11pm
evlPanda said...

K Dog said...

japie said...

evlPanda said...

Mobydisc said...
To say this is not an issue in Australia is not true. In 2008 the federal government promised to guarantee all deposits held with banks up to a million dollars or something like that. So in other words the government backs up some of the biggest and most profitable companies in Australia.


What? That sounds much more like the government backing individual's ...individuals' (...where does the apostrophe go there?) money.




Way I read it is they are backing the bank. Sure it looks as though they are protecting individual's loot, but who gains?


And off the guarantee they ran out and sought further OS funds based on their risk profile... so levered of the gov guarantee....... profit before people... always...


Imagine a company out to make a profit. Just imagine.

By the way: Hand up those that have experienced a run on a bank, that has your money in it.


Obviously I am not against profit, that would be absurd.... you can't really be an absolutist with these things. That's always the easy defense to greed.... what I am against is the way financial systems are architectually designed and who really profits from them... obviously with a lack of competition and protection from the government it puts you in good stead...... I am also against the efforts to prevent market forces by artificially inflating markets by creating more demand through more debt.... if you don't have money, you don't buy.... demand goes down, markets reinvent themselves, evolution... not feeding a crack wh-re with more crack.......

Sure businesses should focus on profit - but governments are supposed to be there for the "people" not business, and make sure business don't take advantage of the "people".... and that is something we have all grown used too.... that now the "corporates" are more of a concern........
FlySurfer
FlySurfer
NSW
4460 posts
NSW, 4460 posts
17 Oct 2011 6:14pm
japie said...
The current system is a giant ponzi scheme that has to be changed, not only for the good of humanity but also for the well being of the planet.


The problem is the Ponzi scheme has collapsed. The Titanic after striking the iceburg took several hours to sink.

All this week and in to next month our "leaders" and unelected representatives are discussing the world order, and the global plan.

Whether we like it or not, things are going to change... we are being fed a constant diet of corporate/government propaganda. Most governments have long been bought and don't really represent our interests.
And since it's going to change, you can either have their way, or get interested in your life, and try have your way.

Or sit back relax, listen to the music and have another glass of bubbly.
FlySurfer
FlySurfer
NSW
4460 posts
NSW, 4460 posts
17 Oct 2011 6:43pm
GalahOnTheBay
GalahOnTheBay
NSW
4188 posts
NSW, 4188 posts
17 Oct 2011 8:01pm
^^^ I'm not sure how Bitcoin solves anything.

In America at least, Bitcoin my actually be illegal anyway:

Mann notes that Bitcoin's ultimate ambition well might be illegal in any event. After all, he points out, there are federal statutes that make it illegal to produce a separate currency. Whether Bitcoin violates those statutes depends on how far it can go along the lines of becoming a true medium for exchange.


from www.forbes.com/sites/petercohan/2011/06/28/can-bitcoin-survive-is-it-legal/
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅