Premium fuel or not?

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
felixdcat
felixdcat
WA
3519 posts
WA, 3519 posts
14 Jul 2011 2:55pm
When I bought my car the dealer told me to use the cheapest fuel I have been doing that for 18 month, the car is running fine. Last week when I filled up I noticed a small sticker close to the fuel bung recommending to use premium fuel. Should I change to premium? What will happen if I keep filling up with non premium?
doggie
doggie
WA
15849 posts
WA, 15849 posts
14 Jul 2011 3:03pm
What car?
FlySurfer
FlySurfer
NSW
4460 posts
NSW, 4460 posts
14 Jul 2011 5:14pm
Does your engine knock when going up hills? If yes, then yes if no, then no.
Also if you have >9:1 compression then yes.
felixdcat
felixdcat
WA
3519 posts
WA, 3519 posts
14 Jul 2011 3:17pm
I have a Great Wall 4 wd, 4 cyl 2.4 l engine no not knocking at all! I pull my yacht (1400 kg ) no problem.
doggie
doggie
WA
15849 posts
WA, 15849 posts
14 Jul 2011 3:20pm
felixdcat said...

I have a Great Wall 4 wd, 4 cyl 2.4 l engine no not knocking at all! I pull my yacht (1400 kg ) no problem.


Just use the 96ron, thats what I used in my old 4WD. In my V8 I use 98ron but I thrash the hell out of it its for sale by the way
Pugwash
Pugwash
WA
7733 posts
WA, 7733 posts
14 Jul 2011 3:24pm
^^^ Sweet

I have a boat for sale - check my items
doggie
doggie
WA
15849 posts
WA, 15849 posts
14 Jul 2011 3:26pm
Pugwash said...

^^^ Sweet

I have a boat for sale - check my items


Wow, thats cheap
felixdcat
felixdcat
WA
3519 posts
WA, 3519 posts
14 Jul 2011 3:35pm
doggie said...

Pugwash said...

^^^ Sweet

I have a boat for sale - check my items


Wow, thats cheap

Still too expensive! The red head sail is a dead give away!
What is the 96 ron, is it the cheap one?

CMC
CMC
QLD
3954 posts
CMC CMC
QLD, 3954 posts
14 Jul 2011 5:40pm
I worked on the road as a sales rep for quite a while and ran the test of value on the different fuels and grades.

In short $50 of premium took my commodore further than $50 of standard.

More expensive per Litre, less litres in the car and further distance travelled. Result, always ran that car on premium.

BP Premium was the best by the way, some other premiums were not as good.


My 2L Van doesnt make anywhere near the difference no matter you use. Just run the test, you could save yourself money using more expensive fuel.
doggie
doggie
WA
15849 posts
WA, 15849 posts
14 Jul 2011 3:55pm
felixdcat said...

doggie said...

Pugwash said...

^^^ Sweet

I have a boat for sale - check my items


Wow, thats cheap

Still too expensive! The red head sail is a dead give away!
What is the 96 ron, is it the cheap one?



92ron is the cheapest, dont use it.
96ron is the most used, bit more expensive. Its the one you should use.
98ron is what you should use in turbo and hi performance cars and if you are towing and the engine starts to rattle and ping. Very expensive
felixdcat
felixdcat
WA
3519 posts
WA, 3519 posts
14 Jul 2011 3:58pm
doggie said...

felixdcat said...

doggie said...

Pugwash said...

^^^ Sweet

I have a boat for sale - check my items


Wow, thats cheap

Still too expensive! The red head sail is a dead give away!
What is the 96 ron, is it the cheap one?



92ron is the cheapest, dont use it.
96ron is the most used, bit more expensive. Its the one you should use.
98ron is what you should use in turbo and hi performance cars and if you are towing and the engine starts to rattle and ping. Very expensive


Cool thank you will do that!

doggie
doggie
WA
15849 posts
WA, 15849 posts
14 Jul 2011 4:00pm
felixdcat said...

doggie said...

felixdcat said...

doggie said...

Pugwash said...

^^^ Sweet

I have a boat for sale - check my items


Wow, thats cheap

Still too expensive! The red head sail is a dead give away!
What is the 96 ron, is it the cheap one?



92ron is the cheapest, dont use it.
96ron is the most used, bit more expensive. Its the one you should use.
98ron is what you should use in turbo and hi performance cars and if you are towing and the engine starts to rattle and ping. Very expensive


Cool thank you will do that!




Anytime
Sailhack
Sailhack
VIC
5000 posts
VIC, 5000 posts
15 Jul 2011 9:49am
felixdcat said...

I have a Great Wall 4 wd, 4 cyl 2.4 l engine no not knocking at all! I pull my yacht (1400 kg ) no problem.


Great Wall - premium fuel? Something doesn't sound right there!

How does the GW go? I looked at buying a Mahindra about 12 months ago, but chickened out due to remembering 'Lada' hitting the market in the 80's. I ended up buying a 6yo Hilux for nearly the same price as the new Mahindra...very happy with the Hilux though.
felixdcat
felixdcat
WA
3519 posts
WA, 3519 posts
15 Jul 2011 10:04am
Sailhack said...

felixdcat said...

I have a Great Wall 4 wd, 4 cyl 2.4 l engine no not knocking at all! I pull my yacht (1400 kg ) no problem.


Great Wall - premium fuel? Something doesn't sound right there!

How does the GW go? I looked at buying a Mahindra about 12 months ago, but chickened out due to remembering 'Lada' hitting the market in the 80's. I ended up buying a 6yo Hilux for nearly the same price as the new Mahindra...very happy with the Hilux though.

I had a MG and bought a trailer yacht, MG could not pull it along, wife decided: you can't have 2 cars sell the MG. Did that and went looking for a car that could pull 1400 kg in and out the water at boat ramp, checked a few 2nd hand 4wd and drove in front of GW dealership. Went in for a laugh Lada style, took a test drive and just got convinced. 2nd hand 4wd for $24,000.00 are mostly old and bitten up. Could not really trust the dealers..... Some still had red dust in little corners
The GW is great, does all I want it to do, comfy, not too thirsty had it for 18 month and not a prob and it is real 4wd has a low range gear box. I will not use it for xtreme 4 wd'ing.
Sailhack
Sailhack
VIC
5000 posts
VIC, 5000 posts
15 Jul 2011 12:42pm
Sounds like you've got it sorted, I reckon a lot of the negative comments come from in regard to 4wds are die-hard 4wders trying to compare the cheaper 4wds to the hardcore ones. We bought an 'awd' wagon (won't disclose make as it's not relevant) a couple of years ago for the wife to drive around and for us to make those family trips - my dad (semi-retired with a Patrol kitted up for touring) made the comment that it "wouldn't be able to tow a 25ft caravan around Aus"! We don't have even have a caravan, we've got a boat - but only tow it 400m to the local boat ramp. The wagon's been great, no complaints here.

I was happy to use the 4wd for a good use on the weekend - towed a carload of tourists that got stuck in soft sand after driving straight onto a beach.
felixdcat
felixdcat
WA
3519 posts
WA, 3519 posts
15 Jul 2011 11:54am
Well, could not afford a fuel guzzler (Land Cruiser) and my GW will do me as good as a LC. I used in soft sand, deflated the tyres and had no prob. You would say it is only 2.4 liters and you work the gear box a bit more but I would give a 9 of 10 rating and recommend it to anyone!
smicko
smicko
WA
2503 posts
WA, 2503 posts
15 Jul 2011 7:14pm
98ron used to make a bit over 10% difference to economy of my 1990 Rangie. Makes bugger all difference to my current Pajero though.
nick0
nick0
NSW
510 posts
NSW, 510 posts
15 Jul 2011 11:20pm
i duno if us fuels at difrent but the mythbusters done this .. useing 3 difrent quality fuels in the same cars .. the top fuel got the car the furthest .. it worked out it was better to buy the best as it costed the least per km
mattyjee
mattyjee
WA
575 posts
WA, 575 posts
16 Jul 2011 10:53pm
Not relevant for you WA type folk, but just stay away from the 91 RON with 10% ethanol and you'll be fine.

While ethanol is high octane, it is also low density (less energy per litre) but more importantly it is hydroscopic - meaning it absorbs water which corrodes the crap out of your fuel system.

A final note - while the difference between 91 and 96 ocatne is simply a few octane numbers, the 98 stuff (ultimate, vortex, optimax, whatever) has extra additives which help dissolve gums and stuff like that.
FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15100 posts
WA, 15100 posts
17 Jul 2011 7:54am
mattyjee said...

Not relevant for you WA type folk, but just stay away from the 91 RON with 10% ethanol and you'll be fine.

While ethanol is high octane, it is also low density (less energy per litre) but more importantly it is hydroscopic - meaning it absorbs water which corrodes the crap out of your fuel system.

A final note - while the difference between 91 and 96 ocatne is simply a few octane numbers, the 98 stuff (ultimate, vortex, optimax, whatever) has extra additives which help dissolve gums and stuff like that.


While I agree its hygroscopic, that should be a good thing. I used to run a bit of metho in my petrol tank every now and then to make sure no water was present. Now its done for you!

In reality, the fuel is not exposed to free air or water, so there should be no way for it to absorb water, and if it does absorb a small amount (from pumping it?), at least it gets it out of your fuel tank.

I suspect the idea of rusting your fuel system out is just a myth.

I figure using an ethanol mix is fine when driving around the city as a lot of time you are idling and not using any more or less if it were a different fuel.

I use premium in my supercharged car as it can actively change the timing to suit the better octane rating. I have never measured it, but I suspect it gives me better economy. The other car is a ford falcon, and while it makes a bit of difference, it is not as noticeable.

Cassa
Cassa
WA
1305 posts
WA, 1305 posts
17 Jul 2011 10:06am
felixdcat said...

Well, could not afford a fuel guzzler (Land Cruiser) and my GW will do me as good as a LC. I used in soft sand, deflated the tyres and had no prob. You would say it is only 2.4 liters and you work the gear box a bit more but I would give a 9 of 10 rating and recommend it to anyone!


I have a landcruiser and your right , 25+litres ph 100kms towing a 6mtr boat, 15+ around town
Then the 4.5ltre petrol got real smokie and developed serious noises, so with that motor I figured the car was only worth 3-4 grand if sold.I started looking to see what I could get for around $25000, and be able to tow 3 tonne, second hand trouble I thought!.After much research (6mths) I put a 6.5litre chev diesel in ,along with 2inch lift , new diffs, new radiator, new 175ltre long range tank,and to go with that 3 inch exhaust. That was $25,000 complete.
Have done several trips to Exmouth since ,without the caravan (18ft tandem , not pop top) I got 13ltrs -100kms sitting between 100kmph and 130kmph out on the straights overall ,1450km.
Towing the van, I got an average of 18 ltrs -100kms, pretty good considering I didn't drive like a fossil .
You can have your petrol, i like my diesel
Macroscien
Macroscien
QLD
6809 posts
QLD, 6809 posts
17 Jul 2011 2:55pm
Why to waste money on petrol?

My car runs on salt water.




All I need to do is just fill up once a week
Herry
Herry
130 posts
130 posts
17 Jul 2011 7:02pm
You can actually tow with a GW? I used to work at a dealership that sold GW. Most people complained that they couldn't tow.
dusta
dusta
WA
2940 posts
WA, 2940 posts
18 Jul 2011 9:36am
def makes a dif .


MY11 forester . Tank of unleaded around town will give me 400-450ish .

Premium will give 500-550ish
felixdcat
felixdcat
WA
3519 posts
WA, 3519 posts
18 Jul 2011 1:15pm
Herry said...

You can actually tow with a GW? I used to work at a dealership that sold GW. Most people complained that they couldn't tow.

Yep tows alright! my boat is about 1300Kg + 200kg booze suply for the day and the GW pulls it along ok, have to ride the gear box a bit to get it to 100kmh and it use low range to go out of the ramp! I guess I could have spent $ 60 k and get a LC but why?
pweedas
pweedas
WA
4642 posts
WA, 4642 posts
18 Jul 2011 11:25pm
dusta said...

def makes a dif .


MY11 forester . Tank of unleaded around town will give me 400-450ish .

Premium will give 500-550ish


The reason you get a better mileage on premium in a modern car is because of the electronics which control the engine. They have a knock sensor which detects when the engine is pre-igniting and if detected, retards the ignition timing until it stops pinging.
So you can pretty much run them on the lowest grade of petrol but the timing will then be significantly retarded and the power and mileage reduced.
You should use a grade of petrol which will allow the engine to maintain the ignition timing at the designed point, rather than have the electronics continually retarding it to account for the low octane rating of the cheper fuel. A retarded ignition means less power and less mileage.
However, it also means longer engine life because the fire isn't lit until the piston is closer to top dead centre, which greatly reduces the peak loads on the crankshaft bearings, pistons etc.

Getting back to the fuel then, all mineral based petrols have almost identical heat content and thus in identical engines with identical settings, they will give the same mileage.
This is a rude shock to everyone who thinks high octane fuels automatically mean more horsepower. That is, put 120 octane av gas in the old FJ holden and it will be much more powerful. It makes no difference because the heat content is the same as 87 octane standard petrol.

The difference is that with the higher octane fuel you can modify the engine to run a higher compression ratio and more advanced ignition timing and other tweakings which will all result in more power. You can't do that on standard fuel because the engine would self destruct due to continuous pre-ignition.

As already mentioned, ethanol has a lower heat content per litre and so can actually reduce mileage.
To run cars on straight methanol, (which is actually ethanol but it's de-natured with a few percent methanol to stop people drinking the stuff) you have to bore the jets out to nearly double size to allow for the extra fuel burn requirement.

FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15100 posts
WA, 15100 posts
19 Jul 2011 6:08am
pweedas said...


As already mentioned, ethanol has a lower heat content per litre and so can actually reduce mileage.
To run cars on straight methanol, (which is actually ethanol but it's de-natured with a few percent methanol to stop people drinking the stuff) you have to bore the jets out to nearly double size to allow for the extra fuel burn requirement.




Isn't this because the stoichiometric ratio for alcohol is different?

If you increase the volume of alcohol to get the correct ratio, do you get the same horsepower per litre of engine volume?
pweedas
pweedas
WA
4642 posts
WA, 4642 posts
19 Jul 2011 11:33am
FormulaNova said...

pweedas said...


As already mentioned, ethanol has a lower heat content per litre and so can actually reduce mileage.
To run cars on straight methanol, (which is actually ethanol but it's de-natured with a few percent methanol to stop people drinking the stuff) you have to bore the jets out to nearly double size to allow for the extra fuel burn requirement.




Isn't this because the stoichiometric ratio for alcohol is different?

Yes. The stoichiometric ratio (perfect air/fuel ratio) is different because of the lower energy content per litre of the alcohol. The amount of oxygen in the cylinder remains the same regardless of what fuel is being used because the cylinder volume remains the same, obviously.
Any fuel with a lower energy content will require more of it to perfectly combine with all the oxygen in the cylinder. Alcohol has about two thirds the energy content per litre compared to petrol and so will require proportionally more fuel to arrive at the perfect stoichiometric ratio.


If you increase the volume of alcohol to get the correct ratio, do you get the same horsepower per litre of engine volume?



Yes. Same horsepower per litre of ENGINE volume, but less horsepower per litre of FUEL volume. i.e. less fuel efficient, and that's what we are talking about.
In fact if you modify the engine you can drag more horsepower out of it running on alcohol. Most commonly, you increase the compression ratio of the engine, which the alcohol will allow you to do because of the much higher octane rating. It's somewhere up around 130 which is better than avgas. It's real hard to get an engine to ping on alcohol.
If you don't modify the engine then it makes no difference other than to make the exhaust smell nice.

Sailhack
Sailhack
VIC
5000 posts
VIC, 5000 posts
19 Jul 2011 3:06pm
Just got my 4wd back from its 150k service & paid the bill... Upside is, not another service for the next 10k (6mths)...and hopefully not as much need doing next time.
Simondo
Simondo
VIC
8025 posts
VIC, 8025 posts
19 Jul 2011 4:22pm
I had heard that Shell 98 was "brewed" (or refined) to be 98, but I had heard that Caltex use an additive to get theirs up to 98.... That was via Sydney Petro-Chem / Oil & Gas guys.... That was Clyde v's Kurnell....

But I'm not sure if is urban myth...

I'm doing some work at Shell North Geelong at the moment.... I did some rough calculations, and they spend between $3 and $10 per minute at that joint !! (I said "rough", and I mean rough!).... And possibly $20/minute in peak times.... Imagine that volume of gold coins spewing out of a slot machine !
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅