Great barrier reef. -- in danger ?

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
SP
SP
10982 posts
SP SP
10982 posts
20 May 2012 9:30am

Just watched this and thought I'd pass it on.



10,000 a year. That's the number of ships that will pass through the Great Barrier Reef if Australia's Overweight Mining Magnates get their way. Clive, Gina and co have got huge plans to get Queensland minerals out of the soil and onto boats. Watch and pass on...



Gwendy
Gwendy
SA
472 posts
SA, 472 posts
20 May 2012 3:37pm
What a lot of people don't realise is that ALL of these ships will be foreign flaged vessels sailing in these waters under the single voyage permit system. Almost ALL of the crews will be foreign also.

They are not bound by the rigid standards of the Australian maritime Safety Authority that Australian flaged ships would be.

Disasters are bound to happen IMO. Gladstone is a disaster right now according to people I know who work there.

There are now less than 25 "blue water" ocean going vessels flying the Australian ensign. Australian shipping has been slowly killed over the past 20 years by the presiding governments at the time.

It frustrates me that an island country like Australia, Where most people live on the coast and good port infrastructure allready exists, Most freight is moved about on highways by heavy vehicle. Too many people are dying on the roads getting squashed by trucks. A properly organised shipping fleet would be much more efficient in every way. Unfortunately it can't satisfy the demand for "overnight freight".
SandS
SandS
VIC
5904 posts
VIC, 5904 posts
20 May 2012 8:05pm
There is a ship drifting out of control at the moment up there some where.
BulldogPup
BulldogPup
6657 posts
6657 posts
20 May 2012 6:27pm
Same's going to happen in NW west WA with the gas plants - why Govts let these criminals trash the jewels just blows me away
Entering areas like these shouldn't even be on the table to discuss stay outta there - verboten!
cisco
cisco
QLD
12365 posts
QLD, 12365 posts
20 May 2012 10:29pm
I made a post with a link to a 4 Corners program highlighting the environmental destruction happening in Gladstone Harbour last year.

Nobody on Seabreeze was interested. They were more concerned about feral goats on the Ningaloo Coast.
FlySurfer
FlySurfer
NSW
4460 posts
NSW, 4460 posts
21 May 2012 1:09am
If Gina and Clive procreated, would they make a Dugong?
SailCoothara
SailCoothara
VIC
137 posts
VIC, 137 posts
21 May 2012 1:12am
What these videos conveniently forget is the hundreds and thousands of jobs the mining sector provides for Australia. The Billions of dollars of income it generates for Australia's economy. Australia's reliance on mineral exportation to continue as a prosperous nation and the fact that mining happens all over the world...

Australia wouldn't be what it is today without the mining boom. Especially when we have governments and unions who can't bare the thought of letting private enterprise develop a profitable manufacturing sector.

Oh and please don't forget that more than half the things you buy today are imported from other countries... Those big bad ships don't all rock up empty handed. Some of them are full of cheap goods from China we all hate so much yet can't resist buying.
dinsdale
dinsdale
WA
1227 posts
WA, 1227 posts
21 May 2012 12:46am
SailCoothara said...

What these videos conveniently forget is the hundreds and thousands of jobs the mining sector provides for Australia. The Billions of dollars of income it generates for Australia's economy. Australia's reliance on mineral exportation to continue as a prosperous nation and the fact that mining happens all over the world...

Australia wouldn't be what it is today without the mining boom. Especially when we have governments and unions who can't bare the thought of letting private enterprise develop a profitable manufacturing sector.

Oh and please don't forget that more than half the things you buy today are imported from other countries... Those big bad ships don't all rock up empty handed. Some of them are full of cheap goods from China we all hate so much yet can't resist buying.

All right folks, move along. Nothing to see here but common sense

Neptune
Neptune
WA
189 posts
WA, 189 posts
21 May 2012 1:38am
SailCoothara said...

What these videos conveniently forget is the hundreds and thousands of jobs the mining sector provides for Australia. The Billions of dollars of income it generates for Australia's economy. Australia's reliance on mineral exportation to continue as a prosperous nation and the fact that mining happens all over the world...

Australia wouldn't be what it is today without the mining boom. Especially when we have governments and unions who can't bare the thought of letting private enterprise develop a profitable manufacturing sector.

Oh and please don't forget that more than half the things you buy today are imported from other countries... Those big bad ships don't all rock up empty handed. Some of them are full of cheap goods from China we all hate so much yet can't resist buying.


All true yes. But can't we ship it all from somewhere else that is not a protected wildlife area that provides for millions of living creatures in the world? and not only that the Great Barrier Reef does a number of things for us. it:
- re-moves carbon Dioxide
- protects the land from harsh weather
- raises $6 billion in tourist money
- may provide medicines in the future
- and provides a great learning to when it comes to the scientific community

From an economic perspective:
Why destroy the reef and loose 6 billion in tourist profit while you can have both tourism and mining as long as the goods get shipped from outside of the great barrier reef. Infrastructure would have to be longer but it is worth it for the sake of the reef.
felixdcat
felixdcat
WA
3519 posts
WA, 3519 posts
21 May 2012 11:06am
FlySurfer said...

If Gina and Clive procreated, would they make a Dugong?


Maaaaaaaaaaate! Gina.............. naked!!!!!!!!!! I used to think about the queen mum when I was about to.... and wanted to go a bit further now I have seen Gina on the tv..... and also the poor old dear carked!

felixdcat
felixdcat
WA
3519 posts
WA, 3519 posts
21 May 2012 11:09am
FlySurfer said...

If Gina and Clive procreated, would they make a very ugly fat red head Dugong?

edited for you!

evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
21 May 2012 1:22pm
SailCoothara said...
Australia wouldn't be what it is today without the mining boom.


I'm confused because I thought manufacturing contributed more to the economy than mining. And what about 'services' at ~70% of GDP? Surely 'services' have made Australia what it is? I'm not saying mining isn't contributing, it so obviously is, but it's so exaggerated so often it makes me throw up a little. It employs directly ~2% of the population, and if you're going to include "related jobs" then you have to include related jobs for all the other sectors too.

If mining is such an awesome sector why do we subsidise it at $4b/year?
Wollemi
Wollemi
NSW
350 posts
NSW, 350 posts
21 May 2012 4:02pm
Gwendy said...

It frustrates me that an island country like Australia, Where most people live on the coast and good port infrastructure allready exists, Most freight is moved about on highways by heavy vehicle. Too many people are dying on the roads getting squashed by trucks. A properly organised shipping fleet would be much more efficient in every way. Unfortunately it can't satisfy the demand for "overnight freight".


What happened in NZ would be a reminder to authorities to the discouragement of shipping along Queensland's coast. Both Napier and Tauranga are on the E coast of NZ's North Island;

On Wednesday, 5 October 2011, at 2:20 AM while sailing in clear weather from Napier to Tauranga, and with a speed of 17 knots (20 mph), MV Rena ran aground on the Astrolabe Reef. The ship was carrying 1,368 containers, eight of which contained hazardous materials, as well as 1,700 tonnes of heavy fuel oil and 200 tonnes of marine diesel oil. Initially the ship listed 11 degrees to port, with the front stuck on the reef.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rena_oil_spill
FlySurfer
FlySurfer
NSW
4460 posts
NSW, 4460 posts
21 May 2012 6:49pm
I have the solution.

1.- Define strict navigation corridors... like 300m wide.
2.- Put speed limits in (10kt)
3.- Put cameras (geostationary satellite) to monitor
4.- Fine the ships ridiculous amounts for offences... if the can't pay, they become fish food... or Gina/Clive can eat them.

The idea is to discourage ships from sailing (navigating) that area.
Whales could swim faster
patsken
patsken
WA
717 posts
WA, 717 posts
21 May 2012 6:27pm
Gwendy said...

What a lot of people don't realise is that ALL of these ships will be foreign flaged vessels sailing in these waters under the single voyage permit system. Almost ALL of the crews will be foreign also.

They are not bound by the rigid standards of the Australian maritime Safety Authority that Australian flaged ships would be.

Disasters are bound to happen IMO. Gladstone is a disaster right now according to people I know who work there.

There are now less than 25 "blue water" ocean going vessels flying the Australian ensign. Australian shipping has been slowly killed over the past 20 years by the presiding governments at the time.

It frustrates me that an island country like Australia, Where most people live on the coast and good port infrastructure allready exists, Most freight is moved about on highways by heavy vehicle. Too many people are dying on the roads getting squashed by trucks. A properly organised shipping fleet would be much more efficient in every way. Unfortunately it can't satisfy the demand for "overnight freight".


If some of the ship owners continue to send outdated and rusted out deathtraps onto our shores without AMSA being fully funded by the government to inspect a bigger percentage (if not every) vessel then we will continue to see these pieces of s__t hit reefs, breakdown or worse, break-up and cause untold damage to the marine habitats.

A modern shipping fleet with well trained crew (Australian or foreign) is the only way we can safeguard our sealanes and that can only be achieved over time when rigorous and persistent inspections are carried out by properly authorised agents of the government. These agencies need to be given the resources to "hit" these not always "third world" operators of floating scrap iron so they get the message that picking a ship up from a line that has "scrapped" the ship and sent it to the breakers and then putting a new crew on it so they can get a couple of more years from it is not worth it financially.

This DOES happen and one of the bigger container shipping lines IS doing it....

patsken
patsken
WA
717 posts
WA, 717 posts
21 May 2012 6:33pm
Wollemi said...

Gwendy said...

It frustrates me that an island country like Australia, Where most people live on the coast and good port infrastructure allready exists, Most freight is moved about on highways by heavy vehicle. Too many people are dying on the roads getting squashed by trucks. A properly organised shipping fleet would be much more efficient in every way. Unfortunately it can't satisfy the demand for "overnight freight".


What happened in NZ would be a reminder to authorities to the discouragement of shipping along Queensland's coast. Both Napier and Tauranga are on the E coast of NZ's North Island;

On Wednesday, 5 October 2011, at 2:20 AM while sailing in clear weather from Napier to Tauranga, and with a speed of 17 knots (20 mph), MV Rena ran aground on the Astrolabe Reef. The ship was carrying 1,368 containers, eight of which contained hazardous materials, as well as 1,700 tonnes of heavy fuel oil and 200 tonnes of marine diesel oil. Initially the ship listed 11 degrees to port, with the front stuck on the reef.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rena_oil_spill



I have worked on the container ship MSC RENA - note the name - and it is or was a piece of old s__t well passed it's use by date. Very common in the shipping industry and more so in the bulk shipping area.
Gwendy
Gwendy
SA
472 posts
SA, 472 posts
21 May 2012 9:51pm
Wollemi said...

Gwendy said...

It frustrates me that an island country like Australia, Where most people live on the coast and good port infrastructure allready exists, Most freight is moved about on highways by heavy vehicle. Too many people are dying on the roads getting squashed by trucks. A properly organised shipping fleet would be much more efficient in every way. Unfortunately it can't satisfy the demand for "overnight freight".


What happened in NZ would be a reminder to authorities to the discouragement of shipping along Queensland's coast. Both Napier and Tauranga are on the E coast of NZ's North Island;

On Wednesday, 5 October 2011, at 2:20 AM while sailing in clear weather from Napier to Tauranga, and with a speed of 17 knots (20 mph), MV Rena ran aground on the Astrolabe Reef. The ship was carrying 1,368 containers, eight of which contained hazardous materials, as well as 1,700 tonnes of heavy fuel oil and 200 tonnes of marine diesel oil. Initially the ship listed 11 degrees to port, with the front stuck on the reef.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rena_oil_spill



This reinforces the point I was making in my original post.

The Rena is (was) a "Flag of convienience" Vessel. Shipping companies use curtain third world states to register their ships for economic reasons. They can lower the maintenance standards if they choose and can employ poorly trained crew at low wages.

Australian shipping on the other hand has a reputation for highly skilled officers and crew and maintenance standards as high as anywhere in the world. AMSA (Australian Maritime Safety Authority) are very strict in enforcing the regulations.

The cause of the demise of Australian shipping is purely financial. Government demanded Australian Shipping be competitive internationaly and were not prepared to subsidise it. So we now have a situation where the foreign ships sailing Australian waters are probably neglected Sh!theaps with incompetent crews. A false economy in my view. What costs more? A well run incident free fleet, or one run on the cheap then the costs of losing one with the environmental issues that go with that.

I beleive the damage to life and infrastucture due to the huge volume of heavy vehicles on the roads is unacceptable. Its a moot point though, An Australian shipping fleet is not going to happen any time soon. Meanwhile, The poor standards of the ships that are here will make a disaster in the barrier reef inevitable.
remo81
remo81
QLD
678 posts
QLD, 678 posts
21 May 2012 11:51pm
Hey Gwendy, did you know that the Aus government has been having talks about Aus having a second shipping register? It will help the shipping owner keep labor costs down while still keeping well trained people in the top positions. ie Aus Officers and foreign crew.

With regards to the fines given to ship owners for damage to the environment, I think that the fines should be directed to the charterer. This would send the dirt boat industry down the same path as the tanker and offshore industries. ie OVID type audits. Most ships are owned by a shelf company that is not worth anything.
Also to do with the fines that are handed out, every ship in the world over 1,000 Gross tonnage has to have bunker a Certificate of liability insurance. This is as The Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims 76. So at the end of the day the fine is not going to hurt the ship owner. Fine the Charterer!!!

Patsken Your comment on the condition about the being 'was a piece of old s__t well passed it's use by date.' Witch classification society do you work for? I am assuming that you are a class surveyor to make a statement such as this Why did you not pull the certificate of class from the ship? As you well know without a certificate of class the Rego is void and you will be sitting on the side of the road I believe the ABS (American Bureau of Shipping) was the classification society of this ship.
patsken
patsken
WA
717 posts
WA, 717 posts
21 May 2012 10:34pm
remo81 said...

Hey Gwendy, did you know that the Aus government has been having talks about Aus having a second shipping register? It will help the shipping owner keep labor costs down while still keeping well trained people in the top positions. ie Aus Officers and foreign crew.
With regards to the fines given to ship owners for damage to the environment, I think that the fines should be directed to the charterer. This would send the dirt boat industry down the same path as the tanker and offshore industries. ie OVID type audits. Most ships are owned by a shelf company that is not worth anything.
Also to do with the fines that are handed out, every ship in the world has bunker liability insurance, In Aus you are not allowed into any port without a Certificate of Bunker Liability Insurance.

Patsken Your comment on the condition about the being 'was a piece of old s__t well passed it's use by date.' Witch classification society do you work for? I am assuming that you are a class surveyor to make a statement such as this Why did you not pull the certificate of class from the ship? As you well know without a certificate of class the Rego is void and you will be sitting on the side of the road I believe the ABS (American Bureau of Shipping) was the classification society of this ship.


Stevedoring....I have to work the likes of the Rena regularly (although most of the container vessels are newer and therefore good) and to me the best way to keep the charterers and owners honest is to set up an inspection process either before they are chartered or at first port of call before load or discharge. The inspections could be targeted at vessels over a certain age and from lines that have a history of shonky ships also. The likes of AMSA and stevedore companies should be working together to sort out this blight.

A few vessels detained by AMSA for repairs certainly would wake up the shipping line involved.

Most container vessels that call into Aus ports are run and maintained well but there is a minority (like the one that hit the reef in NZ!!) that continually "try it on" and thumb their nose at the Australian public and endanger our coast in the name of greed.

Rust and obvious issues relating to above deck maintenance is fairly obvious to us but the bigger problem is in the running of the ship and that is where AMSA need to be on the ball if or when they do inspections....
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23648 posts
WA, 23648 posts
21 May 2012 10:39pm
Tell the mining industry that if they have the $$$ to build a whole new port, a rail line to it, and implement a whole new shipping lane outgoing, then they must have the money to build a refinery here to USE what they dig up....... so we don't sell raw materials to asia and buy it back as finished product.

remo81
remo81
QLD
678 posts
QLD, 678 posts
22 May 2012 1:23am
patsken said...

remo81 said...

Hey Gwendy, did you know that the Aus government has been having talks about Aus having a second shipping register? It will help the shipping owner keep labor costs down while still keeping well trained people in the top positions. ie Aus Officers and foreign crew.
With regards to the fines given to ship owners for damage to the environment, I think that the fines should be directed to the charterer. This would send the dirt boat industry down the same path as the tanker and offshore industries. ie OVID type audits. Most ships are owned by a shelf company that is not worth anything.
Also to do with the fines that are handed out, every ship in the world has bunker liability insurance, In Aus you are not allowed into any port without a Certificate of Bunker Liability Insurance.


Patsken Your comment on the condition about the being 'was a piece of old s__t well passed it's use by date.' Witch classification society do you work for? I am assuming that you are a class surveyor to make a statement such as this Why did you not pull the certificate of class from the ship? As you well know without a certificate of class the Rego is void and you will be sitting on the side of the road I believe the ABS (American Bureau of Shipping) was the classification society of this ship.


Stevedoring....I have to work the likes of the Rena regularly (although most of the container vessels are newer and therefore good) and to me the best way to keep the charterers and owners honest is to set up an inspection process either before they are chartered or at first port of call before load or discharge. The inspections could be targeted at vessels over a certain age and from lines that have a history of shonky ships also. The likes of AMSA and stevedore companies should be working together to sort out this blight.

A few vessels detained by AMSA for repairs certainly would wake up the shipping line involved.

Most container vessels that call into Aus ports are run and maintained well but there is a minority (like the one that hit the reef in NZ!!) that continually "try it on" and thumb their nose at the Australian public and endanger our coast in the name of greed.

Rust and obvious issues relating to above deck maintenance is fairly obvious to us but the bigger problem is in the running of the ship and that is where AMSA need to be on the ball if or when they do inspections....



You might have been told at one of your inductions that you have the right to call AMSA and inform them if you see anything untoward on any vessel that you work on. Just don't call up and say that there is some rust on the deck, it's like the boy who cried wolf… I remember a ship called the Comandate it was arrested in Fremantle in June 2006 because the Pilot boat saw a crack in the hull.
The Port Sate Authority (AMSA) does already conduct these inspections regularly. They also target ships that have had deficiencies at previous ports of call, and vessels that are known around the world. Newer is not always better. Have you heard of a ship called the Iron Monarch? It was built in the 70s and is still trading on the Aus coast. Ships that are built in China, Vietnam, etc. are the ones to watch out for…
Unfortunately AMSA do not have offices in all ports in Aus. It wouldn't even be ¼ of the ports. That aside, they wouldn't be able to man the offices with suitably qualified people if they had an office in every port. My wife wouldn't let me take a 50% pay cut to go and work in one.
cisco
cisco
QLD
12365 posts
QLD, 12365 posts
22 May 2012 1:29am
evlPanda said...

SailCoothara said...
Australia wouldn't be what it is today without the mining boom.


I'm confused because I thought manufacturing contributed more to the economy than mining.


It would if we had any. When we had manufacturing in the dim distant past, the quality of Australian manufacturing was rated among the highest in the world.

The New World Order agenda is that Australia is to be the quarry for the rest of the world.

Australian manufacturing has been killed off and they are currently in the process of killing off our other primary industries of food production.

That is what the "Live cattle export controversy" was all about. Cattle farmers took a big hit with that one.

That is also what the "Murray-Darling water Management Scheme" is all about too.
The system has got more water than ever over the last couple of years and Lake Eyre has filled. But no. Cut off the water supply to the farmers all the way down.

Bundaberg is one of the biggest tomato growing areas in Aus yet the three biggest tomato producers in the area have gone bust. Why is it so?? Tomatoes in Woollworths Bundaberg currently cost $10/kilo yet in Woollworths Brisbane they cost $1/kilo. Why is that so??????

The fishing industry in Queensland is a tenth of what it was 20 years ago due to closures of fishing grounds, limiting of seasons, high fuel prices and onerous regulations imposed on the industry.

Imported seafood is way cheaper than locally caught. Why is that so??

This latest scare will be used as an excuse to shut down more of our maritime resources.

Phuck the mining boom. Shut down 75% of it and hold out for top prices at a regulated rate of extraction and save some of what we have for the future.

It is all just going up in smoke. Look at the cars these days. You pay $30,000 to $50,000 for a fairly average car that after 7 years is lucky to be worth $10,000 and is virtually unrepairable when, not if, something goes wrong with it.


It is all just going up in smoke. Nero plays the fiddle while Rome burns.
Sailhack
Sailhack
VIC
5000 posts
VIC, 5000 posts
22 May 2012 10:03am
^^^ Cisco, that gets my vote for most pessimistic post! Take an 'optimism' pill, pop on a set of rose-coloured glasses & have a lie-down, things will look better tomorrow.
evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
22 May 2012 5:32pm
cisco said...
It is all just going up in smoke. Look at the cars these days. You pay $30,000 to $50,000 for a fairly average car that after 7 years is lucky to be worth $10,000 and is virtually unrepairable when, not if, something goes wrong with it.


Yeah, you see many breakdowns on the side of the road compared to 30 years ago.

Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅