Mark _australia said..
^^^ yeah agreed but what buggered us was
the strikes over no covered walkway to the dunny
knock off at 38.5deg
strike over one bloke who got sacked and probably deserved it
strike over a fridge in the lunch room at 4.5deg not 4.0 deg
OH&S stuff cos somebody got a sore finger so have to do a JSA and employ a consultant to show us how to bang a nail into wood
etc etc ad nauseum
nobody is saying we need to be like asia and treat workers like sh!t - but all the little bits have added up.
We are reaping what we have sown.
People seem to forget when the aussie dollar was 75c US, not on par, and we were still shutting steel mills and a car manufacturer pissed off overseas. You can't blame ONLY a strong dollar for Ford closing up
Australia is a resource rich country that could do anything but it is hamstrung by red tape, OH&S, militant unions (not saying unions are bad, just the militant attitude), over governance and a pussy attitude by workers.
I think a lot of people prefer to buy imported cars. I don't know if this is a style choice, a price choice, or a perceived (or real) quality choice. Going back a few decades, I don't think this was such a big thing.
All around me I see (
dead people) lots of new cars, and very few of them appear to be Holdens or Fords.
Imported cars are cheaper, probably because of the AUD as much as anything else, and people obviously have shifted from buying locally made to imported.
I find it troubling that people associate Falcons or even Commodores with taxis. Gee, I wonder what they use in Germany and Austria as taxis? There even seems to be some status in not owning an Australian car.
Again, I am impressed with the build quality of Aussie cars. You hear of problems, but you hear that with all cars, and usually proportionate to the number of them sold. VW Transporter transmissions anyone? Ford (UK) Transit turbo diesels anyone?
If working conditions are the problem, what extra percentage would it add to the cost of a brand new car?
I've lost track where I read this (here?) but if Ford sell 15,000 new Falcons a year, then approximately $5,000 of that price is for R&D. If you sold 30,000 or 45,000 a year, then obviously the R&D is only $2.5k or $1.7k. So, the number sold, really does make a difference.
On another site people were saying that Ford should have produced cars more suited to most buyers. I don't know how they could have done this, with such a small market. They already sell from small up to large cars, so what else is missing?