nebbian said...
Errr... But... but...
...... So wood is fine. Eating plants and exhaling carbon dioxide is fine.
I really don't understand what's so hard to "get"?
Errr ... But... but...
If a power station burnt biomass and produced CO2 to be in the top 300 emitters in the country it would pay carbon tax, even though it might be burning plantation timber
- and
cattle and other livestock are covered by the carbon tax legislation, so - if a cattle station reported CO2 under the green gas emissions reporting legislation and was in the top 300 emitters in the country it too would pay carbon tax for the cows farting and belching after eating grass.
I really don't understand what's so hard to "get" about the carbon tax not being the solution to climate change
edit : if you don't believe me talk to the Kilcoy Pastoral Company, they pay $23 per tonne for their emissions (along with several paper manufacturers and the Snowy Hydro Company) .