Forums > General Discussion   Shooting the breeze...

Artemis 2

Reply
Created by Brent in Qld Thursday, 2 Apr 2026
Brent in Qld
WA, 1438 posts
Thursday , 2 Apr 2026 5:09PM
Thumbs Up

Too cool, finally up and running.



?si=eJzKA8x_wn8f4Vnb



en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_II

myscreenname
2362 posts
Friday , 3 Apr 2026 6:01AM
Thumbs Up

Yawn.

Maybe we will get something other than Teflon out this latest trip. I fail to see a ROI from spending 100 billion dollars sending a handful of woke people around the moon, when there are so many other initiatives we could do that would improve our lives on earth.

jn1
SA, 2717 posts
Friday , 3 Apr 2026 10:52AM
Thumbs Up

Ha ha, yes, good point . This was also a political issue during the Apollo program. I would rather live in a country with a good health care system, than one that has a good space exploration system.

jn1
SA, 2717 posts
Friday , 3 Apr 2026 10:57AM
Thumbs Up

PS/ Over the years, the more I think about humans in deep and interstellar space, the more idiotic the concept is to me. We are stuck in our magnetic bottle for good I think.

decrepit
WA, 12850 posts
Friday , 3 Apr 2026 8:45AM
Thumbs Up

It's probably Musk driven. he wants to live on Mars

Brent in Qld
WA, 1438 posts
Friday , 3 Apr 2026 2:14PM
Thumbs Up

FK you lot must be fun a parties.

jn1
SA, 2717 posts
Friday , 3 Apr 2026 8:36PM
Thumbs Up

Brent, this is an amazing engineering feat. I just question it's value. The Apollo program revealed cosmic rays punching holes through space suit lids, and through astronaut's heads. They saw flashes of light when this happened. Apollo 11 was an 8 day journey. Imagine 6-9 months of cosmic radiation exposure at the rate these astronauts were exposed to, and completely out of the earth's and moon's magnetospheres ?

I did a basic calculation once to calculate the energies required to divert an typical cosmic ray away from a ship. My calcs were basic and assumed perfect conditions. The energies required were not outrageous, but what if a big bugger from a super nova was heading for the ship ?. What about other stuff like high speed dust ?. It's ok if you're Pioneer 10. That's not going to kill it.

Brent in Qld
WA, 1438 posts
Friday , 3 Apr 2026 7:28PM
Thumbs Up

Space travel is brutal, we have not evolved to survive there. Or on the highest mountains. Or sailing the oceans for years at a time. But the bravest amongst us do these activities despite the risks. Their stories teach us what we can achieve. I think there's more value in that for our species than the endless folly of war.

STUMP
WA, 84 posts
Today , 4 Apr 2026 6:47AM
Thumbs Up

Agreed Brent however I also give credit to the 'id rather spend the money on............' argument.



"The launch team loaded more than 2.6 million litres of fuel into the 32-story Space Launch System rocket on the pad, setting the stage for the Artemis II crew to board"



Hydrogen fuel, but for example.

(H) buses can transport the masses

(H) can generate power.

(H) biproduct is water.



Given our current environment?






Pugwash
WA, 7732 posts
Today , 4 Apr 2026 10:28AM
Thumbs Up

Images make no sense to me. >20 years had me firmly convinced the earth was flat!!!

jn1
SA, 2717 posts
3 hours ago , 4 Apr 2026 8:03PM
Thumbs Up

I hear what you're saying Brett. Australia would not have been discovered with my attitude. But I bet the Apollo program had little knowledge of this radiation hazard, and just sent it. Where as the Artemis crew have lifted on minimum sol activity, and are gobbing down radiation sickness pills.



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > General Discussion   Shooting the breeze...


"Artemis 2" started by Brent in Qld