Do the masses fail to see the bleeding obvious?

You know,I'm talking about all those long lasting trails in the sky that prior to the late 90's were not there.

Was looking at a book at the Cannington library other day. It weighed around 10kg full of countless pics of London from the 1800's to 2000.

The pics are evidence. Not a trail to be seen in the approx thousand plus pics.

Now of course they are visible almost daily.

Regarding 911---- near free-fall collapse of three superstructures,a small hole in a field with no plane wreckage and similar at the Pentagon.

Is this whole con deliberately made to look like a con? I'm beginning to think so.

Building seven being brought down in late afternoon when they could have waited a few more hours and 'pulled it' under the cover of darkness.

The Pentagon wall not collapsing till 20 minutes after whatever hit it.

Then Larry admitting the truth about building seven live on the TV.

Then a female BBC presenter on a live feed from New York to London describing the collapse for 15 minutes of building seven,then in the background the thing is still standing

Never has an inside job been so botched. Or was it by design?