sotired forum posts in last 60 days

Show Edits
Reply in Topic: capping immigration etc
sotired
sotired
WA
605 posts
WA, 605 posts
9 May 2026 3:27pm
Mark _australia said..
Ok I wanna know why we never needed immigration to fill some jobs decades ago. Smart kids became doctors and stuff. Some of them made coffee or flipped burgers while at uni. Dumb kids dig holes at 14 and never went to uni. We had a full spectrum.
are aussies now too good so we need servants? If we cut immigration greatly and cut welfare would more Aussies go get the service industry jobs? I dunno just musings but it seems weird everything worked well right up to the last 20-30yrs..?


Immigration is an easy way to boost the economy without any clever plans or sophisticated schemes.

Step 1: Import people.

Step 2: Hope those people get jobs.

Step 3: Tell the media that you are a clever manager as you have increased the GDP. Not per-person GDP though, as that could be embarrassing if it went the wrong way.

If people complain because it is not well thought out, just call them racists and keep going. They can worry about themselves.

You would think that if we had a recognised huge shortfall of doctors and nurses that we could open up immigration specifically for those sectors. I am not either, so I don't know why it has not happened.
Reply in Topic: capping immigration etc
sotired
sotired
WA
605 posts
WA, 605 posts
9 May 2026 3:21pm
cammd said..

Mark _australia said..
Ok I wanna know why we never needed immigration to fill some jobs decades ago.



Because we kill about 80000 Aussie kids every year through abortion.


This is a bit of a silly argument. If birth control or abortion was only 30% or less effective compared to now, people would change their approach to conception. Those same '80000 Aussie children' still wouldn't exist. They don't exist because those prospective parents don't want kids. How they go about it is up to them. If it weren't abortion it would be something else. If women felt that they would get pregnant 100% of the time, they would change methods or abstain. Women have been controlling their ability to conceive for a long long time.

Even if those 80,000 kids were born, someone else would come along and try and argue 'who will look after those new 80,000 adults each year?'.

sotired
sotired
WA
605 posts
WA, 605 posts
5 May 2026 6:21pm
That's a real shame. It's very much a unique location and crazy windy. I went once and liked the location and novelty of getting there. When I was there the local people seemed pretty okay with everything.

Maybe down the road they will reconsider? Hopefully, as it was a rare opportunity to go to a place of Australia you wouldn't normally see. I can't see why the local people wouldn't like the place to exist.
Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅